Please keep in mind that these bundles are no form of refund, but reimbursement, to give you something of value for your losses. Please refer to the original post.
From the Oxford Dictionary online:
(
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reimburse?q=reimbursement#reimburse__5):
reimburse
Pronunciation: /ˌriːɪmˈbəːs/
verb
[with object]repay (a person who has spent or lost money):
the investors should be reimbursed for their losses
- repay (a sum of money that has been spent or lost): your expenses will be reimbursed
If the reimbursement packages were not intended as reimbursement for losses suffered by the players, then why call them reimbursement packages in the first place? If they were intended as a gesture of goodwill while
actual reimbursement is being considered, then call them goodwill packages. Calling them reimbursement packages implies an intent on those supplying them (Frogster) to offer these as reimbursement. Given that a reasonable person could easily conclude that a reimbursement package was intended as reimbursement, why turn around and say that the proposed reimbursement is not in fact intended as reimbursement when it is rightly decried as manifestly inadequate?
QED