Quoted from "Borella;567600"
This is such bull.. are you trying to run people away from the game? You're doing a pretty good job of it.

Quoted from "Dionaea;567602"
Alright, lets try to turn this constructive please.
This is such bull...
why?
how?
what would be better?
why might it be good?
Constructive feedback please
I can not forward "This is such bull"
Quoted from "Kaseshini;567608"
Is selling the Adventurer Giftbag code from zeevex bannable?
Quoted from "Dionaea;567614"
Just to clarify: The issue is using a payment card and tokens that can be used out of game for other values for ingame gold. Basically you become a goldseller/goldbuyer. If you redeem the card and obtain the free in-game gift code, you can trade the gift code for gold.
Quoted from "vfwiffo;567654"
Oh, for god's sake... as bad as the change is, didn't we already rehash this? We had a big thread, Fan wrote doctoral thesis on the subject, we even had little children threads. Everyone (or maybe just about everyone) thinks it is a bad idea, at least without something else to replace the needed functionality. No point in beating up that dead horse; this is just the official announcement. There is nothing to forward here, and if there are any forwarding to be done, then use one of dozen already l written (and written darn well) anti messages elaborating why this is bad.
Quoted from "thebadtouch09;567656"
Well right now the problem is the gms have ignored every reasonable post and only pay attention to the troll posts.
Weve tried to explain why this will be detrimental to the community and the economy.
Weve tried to explain that it could be atleast partially fixed by letting diamonds be giftable between accounts again (like actual diamonds, not the items).
But none of those posts get any notice.
Quoted from "ruisen2000;567659"
I doubt GM's have an answer to it either, until they receive reply from Upper management, which probably won't happen, because no business will tell its customers "We think we might make more profits that way" .
Quoted from "KatalanOrk;567691"
If people are really saying that they cannot understand why Zeevex trading is against the rules, then I really think you need to reconsider the situation again. It allows money spent on RoM to actually benefit another game, and can be used as an intermediate step to taking real money out of the game.
The point isn't Zeevex, it is the lack of alternative that actually fully meets the needs of players.
Zeevex was an imperfect solution as it was a third party currency with the above issues for the publishers. Trading was also completely on trust. However the advantages were that trading was unlimited in scale and it allowed f2p players to actually get their grubby little mitts on the diamonds themselves to use when and where they liked. Also meant that trading was not largely limited to intense periods during sales. This solution has been replaced as far as I can see by...
Cedric. Never has such a dorky name been so popular. If I was allowed to name my children, I'd call the next one Cedric. The diamonds NPCs have wonderful plus points too. They require no one to spend real money. They suck large amounts of gold out of the game combating inflation and the effects of goldsellers, dupers and the natural inclination of all gold to gravitate towards active end-gamers. They also help control the price of diamonds by giving a natural underlying constant in times of flux. They are also completely secure. However, they are extremely limited in the scale of trading. Only useful for buying diamonds, not selling. They don't directly help control the price of end-game stats or gear (though they do indirectly).
So in summary, we need something that can act like the best of both worlds. Something that allows unlimited (both in volume and timescale), secure trading of diamonds that doesn't allow for real cash to be removed from the game.
Zeevex never was that solution - we have moved from one imperfect solution to another. Don't get me wrong, Cedric is a genius idea, but he can't do the job of diamond trading alone.