

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Cike" (Nov 14th 2013, 6:14pm)
Opposite here for me. I've never been in a siege where an OP warden has decided the match. I've been in several siege where an OP rogue has decided a match though.I have yet to be in a siege where a single OP rogue decides the match. I've been in plenty where a single OP warden does. Yet strangely enough I am not starting stupid "nerf wardens" threads.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "ruisen2000" (Nov 14th 2013, 9:03pm)


I think he was referring to Mage, because Cike said Mages are OP and should be nerfed instead of Rogues.ROGUE pathetic damage progression? I really hope that was sarcasm.. lol. Rogue weapons do so much dps. Look at mages if you want a true example of pathetic weapon damage progression...you could say our pathetic weapon dmg progression is a nerf.
I hope so. Lol. Otherwise...I think he was referring to Mage, because Cike said Mages are OP and should be nerfed instead of Rogues.ROGUE pathetic damage progression? I really hope that was sarcasm.. lol. Rogue weapons do so much dps. Look at mages if you want a true example of pathetic weapon damage progression...you could say our pathetic weapon dmg progression is a nerf.
A lot of things should be programmed for PVP only. It likely isn't going to happen though.I have no issue with putting a CD on hide if they actually programmed it to be in PVP only.... say all in pvp got a buff put on em besides the PK buff you can enable.... and it took 5 seconds of non combat for that to disappear. They could then instead of a total reworking of skills put code in to a skill's cooldown in relation to that buff. Overall a cheaper and easier fix.
and yes Ice Blade didn't deserve to be nerfed.
)