Runes of Magic US / AU

Nice idea. A thought I had about how to implement it could be, if they have 3 of their 4 classes at max level, open availability to an "alternate universe" which is just like whatever zones you recommend, but slightly different, or mirrored.

A while back, I remember someone suggesting an item to reset quests in a zone. Can't remember how that thread ended, but something GF might want to think about ( if creating a new zone is too much trouble ) would be to make a companion to the fruit of forgetting.

Call it a Rebirth stone or something.

Effect: Resets all quests for the toon.

The Rebirth Stone would prompt the user if they truly wish to be reborn ( lose all of their quests ). That would probably solve any issues; if you use it, you lose all of your quests and have to redo them all.

This is a good idea troll . maybe add a faster daily for 50+ as well. 50-69 is terrible

make coo/xav resettable? and/or any additional 55-95 zone that might come as well?

I like the idea of a new alternate zone for 55 to at least 70 since that is the latest elite skill option. Obviously this would benefit the players quite a bit. Making a case that it would improve investment into the game is a bit harder to sell. From the game history we do know that CoO/Xav. was added early on and that it was overall well received by the community. Whether that translated into increased sales, only someone with access to that sales info. would be able to really tell.

Other options I seem to remember being suggested at one point or another would include: advanced honor parties for leveling toons past level 30, increasing the xp/tp from instance mobs and bosses, increasing the xp/tp in battlegrounds and of course as previously mentioned above, offering zone repeat options which since it could be monetized seems like it would be the easiest to sell to the decision makers.

All that said, not for a minute am I gonna hold my breath that any of this will ever happen. There really is no evidence to support that GF/RW takes player suggestions all that seriously for whatever the reason(s). Yes, some things may have changed that players have asked for, but correlation does not imply causation. I have yet to see a forum post acknowledging that player suggestions have lead to any specific changes. Of course I may simply have missed that and will be the first to admit I was wrong if proven otherwise.