You are not logged in.

Implement the siege war reduction already

Applications: [GameMaster: OPEN] | [Volunteer Testers: OPEN]


This forum will be permanently shut down on Friday 13.07.2018
Please copy or save all important information from old forum before they will be deactivated
We have moved to new board. https://forum.runesofmagic.gameforge.com/Come join us.

  • 1
  • 2

LadyMacV

Professional

Posts: 700

Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Occupation: Dental Hygienist

  • Send private message

21

Thursday, June 28th 2012, 8:33pm

Sadly, it makes sense to remove the statement, as it wasn't actually implemented in the patch.
In a world of black, white, and grey... I'd be bright friggin' purple. M/P on Reni.

montanamikey

Trainee

Posts: 93

  • Send private message

22

Thursday, June 28th 2012, 8:34pm

Quoted from "EsxCape;541952"

I don't know if anyone noticed, but Frogster removed the "damage reduction in siege" portion of the chapter 5 patch notes. Sneaky, sneaky.

they do that a lot. most people just don't notice.

masterdesh

Trainee

Posts: 72

  • Send private message

23

Thursday, June 28th 2012, 8:50pm

I'm a little lost here people are complaining about x/k or k/x being strong defensively that's unheard of a tank class that doesn't take much damage I like it might have to try one

kakita01

Intermediate

Posts: 472

  • Send private message

24

Thursday, June 28th 2012, 9:54pm

I think the best dmg reduction they could do for siege is remove the ability to use every freaking buff in the game. Phirius Potions are not allowed so why not remove the ability to use Invis Pots/Codex Foods..Potions... and all the other silly buffs that I cannot think about nor name atm.

Only buffs allowed should be Guild buffs and buffs from Castle Constructs ( Stable/Production Factory )

That would go a long way to allowing us to actually have decent fights in siege.

EsxCape

Intermediate

Posts: 405

Location: USA

Occupation: Community Manager and Customer Support Rep for various online games

  • Send private message

25

Thursday, June 28th 2012, 10:33pm

Quoted from "LadyMacV;541961"

Sadly, it makes sense to remove the statement, as it wasn't actually implemented in the patch.


Yes, but they usually don't have to remove anything from the patch notes if they can implement and/or fix any issues during a maintenance. Its removal signifies that they aren't trying to add it in anytime soon...or perhaps they had tried and failed. There is still a chance that the next patch will include it, but for now we'll have to cast it out of our minds. :/
  • 1
  • 2