I'd always considered you as intelligent until I read this... :p
Phbttt... Hey, deciphering notes aint easy. And those were consistent, although apparently consistently wrong. :p Does it help any if I have no clue what the second change is? That does not help my case, does it?
Back on topic...
I still say that it would be better with no patch. Usually, changes are bundled into patches, so some small changes are ready to go early, but waiting for something bigger to come along. You don't want to nickel and dime your patch process with any small piddly little stuff, you piggyback it on bigger change.
Then, when users don't get a patch, they at least think "well, it is likely my problem is solved, they are just waiting to bundle it with other fixes". By releasing the patch that small, they are casting doubt that there are other, bigger, fixes that are ready. Not a good move when there are fair number of things that should've been ready, considering that we have not had patches for a while now.