You are not logged in.

Applications: [GameMaster: OPEN] | [Volunteer Testers: OPEN]


This forum will be permanently shut down on Friday 13.07.2018
Please copy or save all important information from old forum before they will be deactivated
We have moved to new board. https://forum.runesofmagic.gameforge.com/Come join us.

1

Wednesday, January 23rd 2013, 1:14am

Wd/r dual wield

Just wondering if anyone has done any math with this yet. If so i would love to see the difference in damage that you get

2

Wednesday, January 23rd 2013, 3:31am

With the 2h weapon bonus and buffs, there is no reason to ever go duel weild. And as a wrdn/r think of the dmg you will get from throw with a 2h axe rather than two small daggers.

Rossbot

Intermediate

Posts: 466

Location: 127.0.0.1

Occupation: Web Designer

  • Send private message

3

Wednesday, January 23rd 2013, 4:00am

Stick to 2h weapons. Since you have no 1h weapon mastery as Warden, the damage alone is enough to make you only use 2h weapons over 1h for DPS. W/R often use 2 1h axes because their offhand hits also generate rage (pretty sure but don't quote me) and for offhand stats. This is not very plausible for Warden unlike Warrior because the Warden has no mastery for 1h weapons at all.

4

Thursday, January 24th 2013, 12:57am

Quoted from "Rossbot;585954"

Stick to 2h weapons. Since you have no 1h weapon mastery as Warden, the damage alone is enough to make you only use 2h weapons over 1h for DPS. W/R often use 2 1h axes because their offhand hits also generate rage (pretty sure but don't quote me) and for offhand stats. This is not very plausible for Warden unlike Warrior because the Warden has no mastery for 1h weapons at all.


Dont forget that wd/r has dual wield has faster attack speed. But overall, I feel wd/s is the way to go. You have 2h mastery and chiron.
Artemis - Vargetset - 77 Warden/ 50 Scout/ 42 Rogue - Elusive
Hard work has a future payoff. Laziness pays off now.
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.

Galenwaithien

Intermediate

Posts: 294

Location: Italy

  • Send private message

5

Thursday, January 24th 2013, 1:46am

A faster attack speed on wd/r isnt any advantage

Zombolini

Forum Zombie. Beware.

Posts: 222

Location: Portland OR

Occupation: Zombie General Dorvex

  • Send private message

6

Thursday, January 24th 2013, 2:18am

Wardens aren't about speed, they're about raw damage. They hit big and they hit hard.

Charged chop with a 1h axe just seems lackluster, but spamming it with a 2h weapon deals some crazy damage.

Currently, they're the only viable tank option that can use a 2h and hold aggro. Sure warriors can use 2h and can tank some things, but who plays warrior without playing mage as a secondary? They're all too busy pretending to be Sith lords with their electric magic :P

7

Thursday, January 24th 2013, 3:00am

Quoted from "Zombolini;586068"

Wardens aren't about speed, they're about raw damage. They hit big and they hit hard.

Charged chop with a 1h axe just seems lackluster, but spamming it with a 2h weapon deals some crazy damage.

Currently, they're the only viable tank option that can use a 2h and hold aggro. Sure warriors can use 2h and can tank some things, but who plays warrior without playing mage as a secondary? They're all too busy pretending to be Sith lords with their electric magic :P


lmao...And I wasnt saying Wd/R dual wield cc is better then 2h cc. Just that at least to me it isnt the crappiest you can do.
Artemis - Vargetset - 77 Warden/ 50 Scout/ 42 Rogue - Elusive
Hard work has a future payoff. Laziness pays off now.
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.

Galenwaithien

Intermediate

Posts: 294

Location: Italy

  • Send private message

8

Thursday, January 24th 2013, 2:24pm

Dual wield wd/r is 1/3 weaker than 2h build no matter what. Simply because theres no 1h mastery. No amount of runes and stats on offhand can make up for it.