You are not logged in.
Friday, June 15th 2012, 9:51am
Quoted from "thebadtouch09;538043"
The intention is so that if one team has too many players (say if its 6v1) the game will auto close, because that fight would be just messed up.
)
Tuesday, June 19th 2012, 11:50am
Tuesday, June 19th 2012, 4:44pm
Lol what a stupid thing to complain about. Honestly, you're complaining that a 3 vs 3 battlefield will close if it isn't 3 v 3? It's not 2 vs 2, so it's definitely not going to stay open if there are only 2 players vs 2 players.
Wednesday, June 20th 2012, 1:19am
Why is it stupid? It's something I enjoy thoroughly in this game and one of the only things. It's obvious you have spent little time in battlefields if you think it's stupid, you're just being ignorant.
What you don't understand is that lots of players ALL LEVEL range play in the arenas and them closing automatically ruins the fun myself...AND many others have. I'm sorry you don't experience the same enjoyment that I do in arenas and just because you don't, doesn't mean the complaint is stupid.
If you bothered to read my entire thread comprehensively you would notice that I did mention that they failed to implement new maps.
Wednesday, June 20th 2012, 1:44am
Oh honey. Please re-read what I said, thank you.
"Your complaint is that they made these changes and NOT any new maps."
Then I went on to inform you that they are going to be adding new mini-maps in the future.
Next point of business: You know you've lost an argument when you make statements about someone in a factual manner when you know 0% about that person.
Like what you said: "It's obvious you have spent little time in battlefields."
I have spent PLENTY time in battlefields and quite enjoy them, and think it's about time they finally added more level brackets. However, I still think we will run into the issue of level 29 twinks. Anyways, if one person leaves a 3 vs 3 game, it should definitely end because that is not a fair balance. Same with 6 v 6 and so on.
In my opinion they should have made it so you CAN'T leave battlefields.
)
Wednesday, June 20th 2012, 2:54am
Oh honey. Please re-read what I said, thank you.
"Your complaint is that they made these changes and NOT any new maps."
Then I went on to inform you that they are going to be adding new mini-maps in the future.
Next point of business: You know you've lost an argument when you make statements about someone in a factual manner when you know 0% about that person.
), you live on these forums, I don't. That is the difference. I've read enough of your posts in the last few days to come to any conclusion, also the "next point of business" being used in a thread is very laughable, thanks.
Like what you said: "It's obvious you have spent little time in battlefields."
I have spent PLENTY time in battlefields and quite enjoy them, and think it's about time they finally added more level brackets. However, I still think we will run into the issue of level 29 twinks.
Wednesday, June 20th 2012, 2:56am
Except you are forgetting that there are more tiers to battlefields now. The only place that will somewhat effect people is in the level 50-59 and 60-69 range. Everyone knows the big boy gear comes at 55, so anyone below 55 without their big boy gear will always be at a disadvantage. They should know this joining arenas to begin with.
If it was say 3v2, much of the time another member would join the current match to even it out anyway. Other times a 2v4 match is perfectly balanced regardless of the numbers because people are all at different gear levels.
Wednesday, June 20th 2012, 3:34am
Except you are forgetting that there are more tiers to battlefields now. The only place that will somewhat effect people is in the level 50-59 and 60-69 range. Everyone knows the big boy gear comes at 55, so anyone below 55 without their big boy gear will always be at a disadvantage. They should know this joining arenas to begin with.
Every five levels after that, the gear gets as good as the gear before it plussed and tiered. So levels will always be slightly outbalanced in those tiers, but before that, gear is almost negligible. Tho only instances of outbalance will be the usual twinked out player who got their character to the max level of that tier (i.e. 29, or 39, or 49, etc). However, there's not much that can be done there.
I can't tell you how many times I have joined an arena only to find that the other person leaves upon seeing that my equipment is better than there's.
If you don't have the balls to play in arena, don't join it.
)
Wednesday, July 18th 2012, 7:06pm
I win matches where I am outnumbered ALL the time and would like the option to try taking on the other team instead of having the match forcefully closed.
Thursday, July 19th 2012, 11:59pm
Turthfully, A mage/wd or m/d is better in siege than a priest/scout in equal mage gear. No one screams for their nerf because there are so few of them left from ch 3 were they were god aweful.
Friday, July 20th 2012, 3:06am
You stop that! I dont want to get hit with maga blade anymore.
)
