Krayden has a point, I'd rather the time be taken to do it right than to rush it and have four million bugs and mistakes that were made.. I understand many players that have came back have once again quit because the merge is taking so long, but they will (or at least most of the ones on Artemis will) come back once the server merge has officially been completed.
I agree it's necessary Kalvan. If say reni gets merged into Artemis and people lose their diamonds, even more people will get pissy and rage quit. Though, I feel it is taking longer than it should. Unless they are doing every single account individually. :/
German spending for the rest of us probably lolBecause they know push comes to shove, those of us who have been here the longest, will not leave, regardless of how bad it gets. We haven't left yet, and those of us left must be buying enough diamonds (though not anymore should they really push their promo to 3am) to turn a profit.
German spending for the rest of us probably lolBecause they know push comes to shove, those of us who have been here the longest, will not leave, regardless of how bad it gets. We haven't left yet, and those of us left must be buying enough diamonds (though not anymore should they really push their promo to 3am) to turn a profit.
Some of them pushing over 190k patk unbuffed with no title over there.

While you make a good point, I don't really think most players care overly much about all the details. I think many players would be happy with just regular posts that said something to the effect of "hey, we're still working on it, it's still tracking, we haven't forgotten you". Something more than once a month or more with an "oh by the way, we've decided to do something else first" - don't call us we'll call you - type of post.When I was wee weetle Rusty growing up in Russia, I remember a proverb - "дуракам половину работы не показывают". It means "never let fools see half-finished work".
It never fails to be true. I remember when Swag broke that rule during the original Owenstein modification. He ended up so regretting it.

Previous couple of posts are missing the point. WHY NOT LET THE CONSUMER KNOW YOUR ACTUAL PLANS? and not just talk a big game with no "timetable" behind it. I know this isn't the GMs job, but to think a company doesn't release it's plans to it's consumers is very troubling for me.
:borg:
(note: certain text enlarged to show emphasis by Aqualink)
Quoted
In future, you won't only be able to purchase Diamonds for one server, but instead they will be stored centrally on your account for all servers. Each of your characters from within one region will thus be able to use your balance.
However, to ensure that everything is properly checked and tested, we don't expect this development to happen before autumn.

Previous couple of posts are missing the point. WHY NOT LET THE CONSUMER KNOW YOUR ACTUAL PLANS? and not just talk a big game with no "timetable" behind it. I know this isn't the GMs job, but to think a company doesn't release it's plans to it's consumers is very troubling for me.
![]()
Huh. Perhaps you missed Azathors post from Tuesday, May 26th 2015, 7:31am.
I'll link it for you here: Future server merge plans
And, so you don't have to click to go there, I can copy-paste the relevant info here:
(note: certain text enlarged to show emphasis by Aqualink)
Quoted
In future, you won't only be able to purchase Diamonds for one server, but instead they will be stored centrally on your account for all servers. Each of your characters from within one region will thus be able to use your balance.
However, to ensure that everything is properly checked and tested, we don't expect this development to happen before autumn.
As I've posted before, it is a complicated development process. This game or the payment system was not setup this way and therefore will need to be rewritten completely in some cases to accommodate the change. All we can ask is for patience, for it is a longer process. Popular rumors are true here, Rome was not built in a day (take that in your proverbs and shove it).

Meaning it won't happen this summer and may happen sometime in the future after that.don't expect this development to happen before autumn
An interpreter could say... there is no year mentioned. So, that 'Autumn' (or Fall) reference could really mean next year. The assumer could say... Autumn of this year (2015), which starts on Sept 23rd where they still have ~1 month left.However, to ensure that everything is properly checked and tested, we don't expect this development to happen before Autumn.
That's what the issue is. Give us more info on an actual timeline/detail of the timeline...
